Nice. Congrats!
From a functional standpoint it sounds good...but it's butt ugly. However, I'm speaking out of complete ignorance as CC is not allowed here unless you're a cop or a very extra-special somebody. So can't speak from CC experience...but sounds functional.This is interesting...not sure how I feel about it. Could be a gimmick or it could be a pretty neat innovation. I wouldn't mind testing one...
http://www.taurususa.com/product-details.cfm?id=901&category=Pistol
Any guesses why they went with .38 ACP and not 9mm, .40 or .45?
Established platform...makes sense. Guess I was thinking that they might attract more buyers with more common clambering...as an enticement to overcome the odd look. Dunno?? Jus thinkin out loud........because it's a modified version of their TCP .380.
Much easier and less expensive to put an existing model in a new poly frame than to engineer a new pistol altogether...
Established platform...makes sense. Guess I was thinking that they might attract more buyers with more common clambering...as an enticement to overcome the odd look. Dunno?? Jus thinkin out loud.....