Democrat-sponsored bill will ban these guns… Is YOURS on the list?

Just saw this anyone else hear about it?

Source: http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/12/outrageous-democrat-sponsored-bill-will-ban-these-guns-is-yours-on-the-list/

I'm embarrassed that there are two Republicans and one Democrat from MI supporting this.

So pretty much if it holds bullets or shells it will banned....well...not yet.

It might not hit the floor...now. But as soon as we have another mass shooting. BOOM!!!! Instant legislation. They know they can just hang on to it until a perfect crisis.

Here is the entire bill. It will take about 15 minutes to read it all, and after you do, I assure you that you will feel like you need a shower. It even calls for confiscation of magazines over 10 rounds and even includes 22LR weapons.

(d) Seizure and forfeiture of large capacity ammunition feeding devices.—Subsection (d) of section 924 of title 18, United States Code,

And doesn't even exempt Stevens single shot shotguns by name like it does others, so if it's not expressly exempt, it must not be.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4269/text

We seen this all happen before.....in a little country we call England.

But you've never seen England revolt on the king and queen.

I think it's obvious the same can't be said for America.

Id like to tbink so but as a whole we've become very complacent.

Maybe as a whole.

But not all.

Remember, it only took the 3% to form a more perfect union. Which tells me there have always been too many pussies, but there have always been enough men to make up for it.

It won't go anywhere as AK noted. I think they are only bringing it up now so that during the election next year they can use it against the republicans. Despite poll after poll showing a lack of support for anti gun laws the democrats seems primed and ready to make the next election about guns. The old saying "those that forget the past are doomed to repeat it" is true and the democrats seem to have short memories. Guns cost them Congress in 1994 and likely Al Gore the presidency in 2000.

Anyone else notice this verbiage in the opening title?

To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited

Yes, one of the first things to catch my eye.

California law allows police to seize firearms

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/California-Gun-Law-Seize-Guns-Without/2015/12/30/id/707588/