• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

President Trump's Executive Actions so far...

S

SHOOTER13

Guest
By Gregory Korte...USA Today

WASHINGTON — In just his first 10 days on the job, President Trump has already signed two proclamations, seven executive orders and seven presidential memoranda. He's invented a new form of presidential directive — the national security presidential memorandum — and signed three of those.

And his chief of staff has signed another document — a regulatory freeze — that carries the same force as a presidential order. It's the most prolific use of executive action to start a presidency in modern history.

And he has more on tap.

They cover subjects as wide-ranging as national security, immigration, health care, manufacturing, energy and regulation. While the White House often uses the term "executive orders," the documents that Trump has signed have come in varying forms, all of which have the same force of law.

Here's the complete list of actions Trump has signed so far:

Friday, January 20

Proclamation 9570
: National Day of Patriotic Devotion
As one of his first official acts, President Trump declared his inauguration day to be a "National Day of Patriotic Devotion." The tradition goes back to President George H.W. Bush, but Trump's proclamation was less personal and more nationalistic than his predecessors.

Executive Order 13765: Minimizing the Economic Burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pending Repeal

Trump's first executive order was as much a messaging document as a policy-making one, emphasizing Trump administration to seek the repeal of the health insurance law known as Obamacare. While the order was vague about what specific measures the administration will take — using the phrase "to the maximum extent permitted by law" three times — it suggests that federal agencies give states, insurance companies and consumers the maximum amount of flexibility in complying with the law.

Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Regulatory Freeze Pending Review

The "regulatory freeze" memo is not technically a presidential action. Following tradition, the memo came from the new president's chief of staff, Reince Priebus. But it has the same force and effect as if the president signed it: An immediate halt to the publication of any new regulations. The freeze lifts when Trump's nominees to lead agencies are confirmed by the Senate. The White House Office of Management and Budget may make exceptions for health, safety, financial, or national security matters.

Monday, January 23

Presidential Memorandum: Withdrawal of the United States From the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement

The Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, was a 12-member trade pact of countries along the Pacific Rim. Trump's directive made it 11, formally withdrawing from the trade agreement. While the Obama-negotiated agreement was unlikely to be ratified by Congress anyway, the memorandum also set forth a Trump administration policy of negotiating future trade deals one by one, instead of regional, multi-national agreements.

Presidential Memorandum: Mexico City Policy

The Mexico City Policy, known to critics as the global gag rule, was a Reagan-Bush policy that restricted the use of foreign aid money to support family planning organizations that promote abortion. Trump's memorandum reinstated that policy, which had been rescinded by Obama, but also vastly expanded it: The restriction now applies not just to the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development, but now all federal funding. And the ban applies to all global health aid, not just family planning.

Presidential Memorandum: Hiring Freeze

Most recent presidents have instituted some kind of hiring freeze, often just long enough for the president's new cabinet members to be confirmed so they can make their own hiring decisions. While Trump makes an exception for the military, it also forbids contracting to circumvent the ban. The order calls for a long-term plan to reduce the federal workforce within 90 days.

Tuesday, January 24
Presidential Memorandum: Construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline

The Obama administration scuttled the proposed 1,179-mile cross-border pipeline from Alberta to Nebraska, which Republicans had supported as a job-booster. Trump invited pipeline company, Transcanada, "to promptly resubmit its application," and ordered the secretary of State to make a decision within 60 days, fast-tracking existing procedural requirements.

Presidential Memorandum: Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline

A separate order applied to the Dakota Access Pipeline, a 1,172-mile pipeline from North Dakota to Illinois. That project has been the subject of heated protests by American Indian groups and environmentalists. Because the pipeline crosses waterways, it needs approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Trump ordered the Army to "review and approve in an expedited manner" the permit.

Presidential Memorandum: Construction of American Pipelines

Trump asked the secretary of Commerce to review ways to mandate the use of American-made steel in pipeline projects. for all new, expanded or retrofitted pipelines in the United States. The plan is due in six months.

Executive Order 13766: Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approvals for High Priority Infrastructure Projects

The order sets up a new system to fast-track infrastructure projects. Under the executive order, any governor or cabinet secretary can ask for a project to be designated as high-priority. If the chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality approves, the project will go to the front of the line for any agency required to review and approve the project.

Presidential Memorandum:Streamlining Permitting and Reducing Regulatory Burdens for Domestic Manufacturing

Under this order, the secretary of Commerce will launch a review of manufacturing regulations with the goal of streamlining those rules. The secretary will seek input on the issue over the next 60 days, with a report to Trump containing specific proposals 60 days after that.

 
Wednesday, January 25

Proclamation 9571: National School Choice Week, 2017

Trump proclaimed the week of Jan, 22 as National School Choice week. Though the proclamation was entirely ceremonial, Trump is the first president ever to proclaim this week, which is sponsored by a coalition of charter, magnet, private, online and home schools.

Executive Order 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements

This is the "build the wall" executive order, directing the Customs and Border Patrol to "secure the southern border of the United States through the immediate construction of a physical wall on the southern border." The order also directs the hiring of 5,000 more border patrol officers. The order does not specify how the wall would be paid for, but does request a report on all U.S. foreign aid to Mexico over the last five years.

Executive Order 13768: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States

Complementing the border wall, this executive order applies to immigration enforcement in the interior, and specifically targets so-called "sanctuary cities" by cutting off their federal funding. The order also expands the enforcement priorities in order to give immigration officers almost unlimited discretion in instituting deportation proceedings, to include any non-citizen not yet charged a crime but who, in the judgment of an immigration officer, poses a risk to public safety or national security.

Friday, January 27

Executive Order: Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States

This is perhaps Trump's most controversial executive order to date, leading to weekend protests at international airports across the country. Trump promised to keep "radical Islamic terrorists" out of the country, largely though a ban on entry from seven countries for 90 days. Those countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen) are all majority Muslim, and the order allows an exception for religious minorities, which Trump said was to protect Christians there. The order was subject to immediate action in three federal courts in the 48 hours after its signing, in order to protect people who were caught in legal limbo when they arrived at U.S. airports.

National Security Presidential Memorandum 1: Rebuilding the U.S. Armed Forces

The presidential national security memorandum — a first-of-its-kind presidential directive — calls for a 30-day review of military readiness. It requires the the Pentagon and Office of Management and Budget to come up with a plan to bolster the military, and calls for an examination of the nation's nuclear arsenal and missile-defense capabilities.

Saturday, January 28

Executive Order: Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Employees

In one sense, Trump's executive order on administration ethics goes further than any similar order in history, imposing a lifetime ban on administration officials lobbying foreign governments, and a five-year ban on other types of lobbying. But that ban covers only people who were lobbyists before they joined the administration, leaving a loophole for non-lobbyists, ethics experts said.

National Security Presidential Memorandum 2: Organization of the National Security Council and the Homeland Security Council

Every modern president signs an order early in his term reorganizing the National Security Council. Trump's order most notably added his chief political strategist, Stephen Bannon, to sit on the influential Principals Committee.

National Security Presidential Memorandum 3: Plan to Defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria

This memorandum calls for the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with other national security officials, to develop a plan within 30 days to defeat the Islamic State. The plan should include "recommended changes to any United States rules of engagement" as well as any diplomatic, financial or cyber measures that the Trump administration can take.

Monday, January 30

Executive Order: Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs

Trump's so-called "one in, two out" executive order would require agencies to rescind two existing regulations for every one new regulation — and that the regulatory costs of those new regulations balance out. The order would also tighten the president's grip on the regulatory process by giving each agency an annual quota of regulations through the federal budgeting process.
 
My head is spinning, but I like that fact he is working his tail off. Now the senate needs to speed up confirmation hearings.
 
while I applaud his efforts thus far. I fear the precedent set forth by Obama will lead us into an executive branch fiat going forward with each new president.
 
Water Monkey, you might very well be right. Hopefully as time passes Trump will get the congress involved and they will start doing what is right instead of just trying to get re-elected. Following Obama is like following a horse in a parade. Gotta watch every step he takes. Also, there is a great struggle going on to change the ideology of the country. They seem hell bent on bringing this country down to the level of others in the name of fairness to the world. Of course they want to remain in their ivory tower and look down at the peasants. As long as we have a SCOTUS and POTUS that believe in and defend the 2nd and the 4th amendments we should be good for a long time.
 
Last edited:
Well maybe we'll get lucky, and on the way out the door, Trump will sort of close the door on that rule by fiat business.
 
while I applaud his efforts thus far. I fear the precedent set forth by Obama will lead us into an executive branch fiat going forward with each new president.
That is my concern too. I don't like governing by Executive Order. I don't like it from Obama. I understand that Trump needs to use them to cancel out the Obama orders but after that he needs to only use them to operate the Executive Branch. Unfortunately I think he will use them all he can. He is use to making decisions and that was that. I don't think he will like working with Congress unless they roll over and just do his bidding. Time will tell.
 
A highly unlikely scenario would have congress pull their heads out and start working. Probably the only way that will happen is if a bunch of lefty senators lose their seats in '18. Right now too many folks have too thinned skin and the left sees that as their advantage.
 
A highly unlikely scenario would have congress pull their heads out and start working. Probably the only way that will happen is if a bunch of lefty senators lose their seats in '18. Right now too many folks have too thinned skin and the left sees that as their advantage.

There are 8 seats vulnerable that I see in 2018. Based on the 2016 election map. Could be a large swing in 2018.

Time will tell. mid terms have been favoring a large republican turn out in the past 10 years.
 
WaterMonkey I hope you are right. The Dems, if they get their act together, will work hard to keep those. I hope the Republicans work hard as well, and work hard between now and then. From all indications the Dems are going to push back on everything Trump and or the Republicans try to do between now and then.
 
If those seats are in the heartland, we're lucky.

I want to see Republican congressmen publicly validating the President's executive actions. They can't sit on the fence if they want party momentum and solidarity for '18.

Even if they don't agree 100%, they need to "hold their nose and vote" with Trump.
 
WaterMonkey I hope you are right. The Dems, if they get their act together, will work hard to keep those. I hope the Republicans work hard as well, and work hard between now and then. From all indications the Dems are going to push back on everything Trump and or the Republicans try to do between now and then.

As of right now they are doubling down on stupid. Trying to legitimize violent fascist behavior by calling those they physically attack... "fascists". Normal people in the center are taking notice and calling BS on their tactics. And people are very "aware" of how the MSM is covering for them.

The veil dropped during the election cycle on how partisan many of the major networks are. And they have no answer to that revelation other than ramping up the rhetoric as if to say "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain".

Repubs need to field solid candidates in states that went RED last election and really hammer away.

Repubs also need to stop playing nice until the Dems 180 their antics. I mean for literally 6 years the Repubs gave the Dems everything they asked for.... everything. Despite popular mandate to stall and quell a lot of the far left agenda.

I hope Ginsberg leaves within the next year or so. Putting 2 on the board will be such a nice Eff You to these commie fecal demons.
 
You can buy all the press you need. The undercover antics and leaks last year proved that to anyone who didn't purposefully ignore it.

But the media is bought and paid for, and is never run in the public interest, as per the official spirit of the FCC.
 
Last edited:
It looks now as if Trump not only has to battle Liberals, Democrats, some Republicans, and the MSM, but also the left coast liberal courts. Ginsburg leaving would be a blessing for sure.

The Dems have really ratched up their resistance this time. Since they are outnumbered in the congress their leadership has taken to the streets.It seems as if there is a group of politicians at every one of these protests that turn into riots. In my opinion that could be very dangerous. Folks are going to get very tired of those tactics in a short while.

You are right WM, the Repubs need to be playing hardball, and they need to be thinking about 2018 right now. I would love to see Warren and Booker and Kaine and Schumer gone. Others as well, but those four popped up first.
 
@Water Monkey writes> while I applaud his efforts thus far. I fear the precedent set forth by Obama will lead us into an executive branch fiat going forward with each new president.
_____________________________________
I agree. I hope he does not go all Ex Order over every problem. I criticized his over-the-top use of EOs as I did Obama, thinking that habitually bypassing Congress would be a bad strategy and policy.

I even objected to the "immigrant ban" thinking it was an overstep, but in researching such a ban I came across this:

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT
...
(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.

So I'll give President Trump a pass on this case so far.

Scoop




______________________________
upload_2017-2-5_11-28-43.jpeg
Donald J. Trump
 
I don't have any problem with President Trump writing executive orders, as long as the majority of the Congress will uphold them. If the majority of the Congress disagrees with his actions, then things are not going to run very smoothly.

But the president can do things very quickly compared to the Congress, and as long as the Congress does not (in a majority) disagree, I see no problem with this method.

If the majority of the Congress does disagree then they should pass a law that recinds, modifies or corrects the president's action.
 
My head is spinning, but I like that fact he is working his tail off. Now the senate needs to speed up confirmation hearings.

I voted for Donald Trump for ONE main purpose... to fill the hole(s) on the Supreme Court with justices that will deliver Constitutionally based decisions.

Agree: Now the senate needs to speed up confirmations.
 
I have a new modus operandi when people react with shock to the fact that I voted for Trump.

I told them "I held my nose and voted for Trump, because I didn't want to put a confirmed criminal in the Whitehouse."

Now many people might think Trump is a criminal, but it was proved about Hillary and the DNC. The FBI gave us all the evidence of her guilt and then said they decided not to prosecute her for whatever reason. The DNC chairman stepped down because of her guilt in underhanded affairs, but again it was decided not to prosecute for whatever reason.

But she/they were Stone Cold guilty and caught red-handed. Anybody that doesn't understand that has their head in the sand.
 
@SHOOTER13 this is a great topic....I hope you can continue with this....it's good to see positive stuff here....
 
Back
Top