• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

SD: Constitutional Carry allowed

Scoop

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Global Moderator
By Dave Dolbee published on February 5, 2019 in News

On January 31, 2019, Governor Kristi Noem signed her first bill into law. The bill was SB47, South Dakota Constitutional Carry. From sd.gov:

Governor Kristi Noem today signed her first bill into law. SB47, which Noem signed today, will further protect the Second Amendment rights of South Dakotans by allowing constitutional carry. The bill will go into effect July 1, 2019.

“More than 230 years ago, the Founding Fathers of our country penned the Constitution that has since laid the framework for centuries of policies. They so firmly believed in the importance of the freedom to bear arms that they enshrined it into the Constitution’s Second Amendment,” said Noem. “This constitutional carry legislation will further protect the Second Amendment rights of South Dakotans.

The current South Dakota permit system, with a base permit and an enhanced permit, will remain in place. It simply will not be illegal for people to carry openly or concealed without a permit.

The bill passed extremely rapidly. I was impressed. The South Dakota legislature kept their word. Governor Noem kept her word. Bill SB 47 passed on 22 January, 2019, in the Senate. From argusleader.com:

PIERRE — A bill allowing people to carry concealed handguns without a permit has passed the South Dakota Senate.

Senate Bill 47 will now go to the South Dakota House for consideration after the Senate passed the measure, sometimes called “constitutional carry,” in a 23-11 vote after an hour of debate on Tuesday afternoon.

The South Dakota House passed SB47 on 29 Jan 2019 47 to 23.

The bill appears to be straightforward, repealing sections of South Dakota law.

Here is one of the sections repealed:

22-14-9. Carrying concealed pistol or revolver without a permit—Misdemeanor. Any person, other than a law enforcement officer as defined in § 22-1-2 acting under color of authority, who:

(1) Carries a pistol or revolver, loaded or unloaded, concealed on or about his or her person without a permit as provided in chapter 23-7; or
(2) Carries a pistol or revolver, loaded or unloaded, concealed in any vehicle while operating the vehicle, without a permit as provided in chapter 23-7; is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

The current South Dakota permit system, with a base permit and an enhanced permit, will remain in place. It simply will not be illegal for people to carry openly or concealed without a permit. Minors will need to be accompanied by a parent or guardian if they are carrying concealed.

South Dakota is a strongly conservative state. I expected it to pass Constitutional Carry years ago.

Constitutional Carry is a reform and repeal of gun laws restrictions. The reform and repeals approximate the level of restrictions in place when the Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791.

South Dakota passed Constitutional Carry more than once. Popular Republican governor Dennis Daugaard vetoed a Constitutional Carry more than once. He vetoed a Constitutional Carry bill on March 17, 2017.

Governor Daugaard vetoed his first Constitutional Carry bill in 2012. In between, Daugaard was certain to lobby against Constitutional carry, and get it killed with legislative maneuvers.

Governors do not like to veto popular bills. It makes them look bad. Legislators do not like to override vetoes of governors of their party. Governor Daugaard seems to have had a phobia against Constitutional Carry.

South Dakota is now the 14th State to pass Constitutional Carry. Oklahoma is the next state most likely to join the list. Governor Fallin vetoed Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma in 2018, on May 11th. Oklahoma has a new governor.

The Oklahoma legislature need only look to South Dakota for success.
clap.gif


Does your state allow Constitutional carry? Share your state’s best gun rights successes in the comment section.
©2017 by Dean Weingarten

 
Last edited:
In the article above I emphasized the paragraph:
The current South Dakota permit system, with a base permit and an enhanced permit, will remain in place. It simply will not be illegal for people to carry openly or concealed without a permit. Minors will need to be accompanied by a parent or guardian if they are carrying concealed.

It is very important, in my opinion, that the passing of Constitutional Carry laws does NOT eliminate the state's existing permit system. The reason, of course, is because the reciprocity between states may still require a permit from the visitor.

If the state does away w/ the permit system, then those citizens may not be able to continue their travel to some other states that do not recognize the Constitutional Carry provision as qualifying.

Keep that in mind if your state is headed for CC. Make sure your legislators keep some sort of "qualification indicator" for carry, even if it just an extra endorsement on a drivers license.

license_20121027180427_80337.jpg
 
We're trying to get that done here too.

Paying the state a CCW licensing sucks.

Only good thing about it, exempted from 4473 call ins, which aren't a problem anyway.
 
Georgia is again fighting, we elected a,pro governor who promised hed sign it. Now we have a leading old school leader Republican RINO, DAVID RALSTON who panders to,the dems keeping it out of,Committee fighting us tooth and nail , its getting nasty., see where it,goes. We have a very strong pro 2A lobby but also alot of,foreign influence ($$$) aka stacy abrams/soros/hollyweird(more film made Georgia than anywhere) trying to twist our state.
 
In the article above I emphasized the paragraph:
The current South Dakota permit system, with a base permit and an enhanced permit, will remain in place. It simply will not be illegal for people to carry openly or concealed without a permit. Minors will need to be accompanied by a parent or guardian if they are carrying concealed.

It is very important, in my opinion, that the passing of Constitutional Carry laws does NOT eliminate the state's existing permit system. The reason, of course, is because the reciprocity between states may still require a permit from the visitor.

If the state does away w/ the permit system, then those citizens may not be able to continue their travel to some other states that do not recognize the Constitutional Carry provision as qualifying.

Keep that in mind if your state is headed for CC. Make sure your legislators keep some sort of "qualification indicator" for carry, even if it just an extra endorsement on a drivers license.

license_20121027180427_80337.jpg

Scoop, thanks for sharing. I had not given any thought about the travel issue.
 
Back
Top