• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

War on coal casualties

Supposedly the new regulations cover the SCOTUS decision.

EPA collusion with tree hugger groups. At minimum some of this is illegal yet we know that will be ignored.
Numerous emails appear to show close coordination between the EPA and environmental groups in drafting the controversial Clean Power Plan which could mark the demise of coal-fired power plants in the United States.
The emails, obtained by Fox News, came to light in a lawsuit filed by the Energy and Environment Legal Institute. Chris Horner, of EELI, told Fox News he believes the emails show a breach of the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946, which codifies constitutional guarantees in federal rulemaking.
"There is a process under our laws -- very specific, very precise -- detailing how agencies are allowed to write what is, in effect, law," Horner said. "They are to afford all parties equal right to participate. They are not permitted to write rules in the backroom with your buddy or on Yahoo accounts with your buddy."
In one email, Sierra Club's lobbyist John Coequet jokes to two senior EPA executives: "Pants on Fire." That's his observation to a reference then-assistant EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy made in an Aug. 15, 2012, keynote address to Coal-Gen, a coal industry group. McCarthy told the crowd, "Coal will continue to provide more of Americans' electricity than any other fuel source, producing nearly 40 percent of all generation in 2035."
Horner said, "They all knew this was a lie. They were saying what they knew they would have to say just to get by."
In another memo, an EPA staffer writes a colleague, "Is it possible for you all to put together a summary of the arguments the Sierra Club made on why GHG [greenhouse gases] are currently regulated under the CAA [Clean Air Act]? Gina would like to get a copy."
And in another, a Sierra Club lobbyist writes how the EPA could craft a standard that no coal-fired plant could meet, while an EPA associate administrator, Michael Goo, responds on his Yahoo account, "attached is a memo I didn't want to send in public."
The power rule was finalized Monday and sets ambitious targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants. McCarthy, now EPA administrator, in a recent YouTube clip that lauds the open, public process behind the Clean Power Plan, said, "You know how I know we got this rule right? Because we listened. Even before we put pen to paper on our proposal, we held hundreds of meetings and conversations. We received 4.3 million comments on our proposal."
As of publication time, EPA had not responded to requests for comment from Fox News.
The emails have prompted a congressional inquiry. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, chairman of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology, earlier wrote former assistant administrator Goo asking him to preserve all his private emails dealing with official correspondence from 2011 to 2014. Smith wrote, "You seemingly routinely communicated with third party groups attempting to influence the Administration's agenda."
The Energy and Environment Legal Institute says it will file suit in the next 60 days to stop the Clean Power Plan. But it acknowledges the limitations of its legal recourse.
"Will EPA be allowed to impose all of the harms it intends over the few years it would take the courts to get to this, or will Congress pull the plug, or will the court issue a stay?" Horner asked.
 
I'll tell you what I wish.

All coal mines refuse to sell to anyone in the U.S. for the next 6 months and watch things go dark and laugh as the outcry gets deafening. That's what should happen.
 
That would surely get the issue front and center for the media and presidential candidates...maybe even Barry would care. Then again, maybe not. It would make the race baiters that are trying to start riots in our cities happy when the lights went out.
 
This should raise eye brows. George Soros, billionaire and financial supporter of the radical left has for years used his wealth and think tanks to demonize the coal industry under the guise of "global warming". Now that the value of coal mines is as low as a snakes belly old Georgie boy has been buying coal mines. This includes the top tonnage producer in the U.S. The left shreds the Koch Brothers but are silent on this one. Follow the money guys, follow the money.

Billionaire George Soros warms up to coal as stock prices hit bottom


April 9, 2015: Georges Soros, Chairman of Soros Fund Management, attends the annual conference of the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development headquarters in Paris. (REUTERS/Charles Platia)
Billionaire investor George Soros, who has demonized fossil fuels for years through his think tanks and political contributions, seems to have warmed up to Big Coal now that stocks are dirt cheap.
The left-wing hedge fund legend has raised eyebrows with major purchases of stock in two large coal companies, firms his critics say he helped bring to their knees. While buying low is the hallmark of any shrewd investor, buying coal goes against the political and environmental ideology Soros has long espoused.
“I find it very interesting that George Soros would buy shares in those coal companies,” said Daniel Simmons, vice president for Policy at the Washington DC-based free market energy group, Institute for Energy Research. “I am confused given the non profits he funds and how hard they have worked to demonize coal.”
Soros, whose Climate Policy Initiative think tank recently urged the world to stop using fossil fuels in general and coal in particular, snapped up 1 million shares of Peabody Energy and half a million shares of Arch Coal, giving him significant stakes in what’s left of the U.S. coal industry.
The trades would have cost Soros a lot more six years ago, when Peabody, which trades under the symbol BTU, was at about $90 a share. Under the Obama administration, which has punished the coal industry with costly mandates and regulation, Peabody shares have fallen to around $1.
Related Image
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/08/1...warms-up-to-coal-as-stock-prices-hit-bottom/#

Neither Soros nor his New York-based investment firm, Soros Fund Management, would comment on the coal play, citing a longstanding policy of not discussing investments.
The 85-year-old hedge fund manager has a net worth of $24.2 billion, according to Forbes.com, which makes him the 19th wealthiest person in U.S. and second among hedge fund managers.
The most recent filing shows Soros Fund Management holds stakes in 263 companies with a total value of nearly $11 billion.

The filing shows the purchases of 553,200 shares of Arch Coal for $188,000 and an investment of $2,254,000 into Peabody Energy for 1,029,400 shares, which means he’s lost money on both so far. Peabody, the biggest coal producer in the U.S. by output, said in a recent statement that it “has been trying to turn itself around as it faces challenges from low natural-gas prices, a glut of global coal supplies, weakened demand from China and a growing public call to cut carbon emissions.”

Soros Fund Management previously held $234 million in shares in the coal producing company, CONSOL Energy, but sold the shares over the last year, according to SNL.com.

Free market energy experts note Soros has invested more than a billion dollars into think tanks, lobbyists, political action committees and politicians who have pushed for regulations that have nearly destroyed the coal industry, in favor of so called “clean energy.”

Soros invested $1 billion in clean energy technology beginning in 2009, according to Bloomberg News. He also founded the Climate Policy Initiative, a San Francisco-based organization, in which he is investing $100 million over a decade, Bloomberg News reports. Among its partners is the UK Department of Energy & Climate Change, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety, and the U.S. Department of State. The Climate Policy Initiative released a report last year suggesting the world should transition away from coal.

Soros' Open Society Foundations, which has assets of $1.5 million, according to its most recent IRS 990 tax form, claims over the last three decades expenditures of $12 billion.
Soros was convicted in a French court in 2009 of insider trading, which cost him the equivalent of $2.5 million in fines. That was the amount French prosecutors claimed he made 14 years ago after investing, allegedly with insider knowledge, in the French bank Société Générale - a charge Soros denied.
FECINfo.com, the Political Moneyline database of Federal Election Commission records for donations that George Soros made during the 2012, 2014, and 2016 election cycles, shows 139 records for more than $8.8 million.

In 2015, he made two contributions of $1 million each to Priorities USA Action Super PAC and American Bridge 21st Century Super PAC. He initially supported Hillary Clinton for President when he donated $25,000 to the Ready For Hillary PAC in 2013.

Soros backed President Obama, who notably campaigned in 2008 shutting down the coal industry, a promise industry experts say he’s kept.

“The drop in coal market stock is directly related to the promise that Obama made to his environmental extremist supporters – ‘you can build coal fired power plants, but we will shut them down,’” said John Sparr, a mining engineer and geologist who specializes in the coal industry.
Investments in coal under current conditions bear little risk given the low stock prices.
“With markets dwindling, coal companies shutting down and workers being laid off, it is no wonder that stocks are crashing,” Sparr said.
But should there be a change in the regulatory climate, coal stocks could become a bargain.
The important thing about coal, Simmons said, is a little over 10 years ago, coal produced 50 percent of energy in the U.S. and that is now at 40 percent and continuing to trend downward.
Michael South, a UK-based mining and energy consultant, told FoxNews.com that while coal prices have suffered around the world in part because of a drop in demand from China and other countries, and fracking, which produced natural gas at a cheaper price, there is still a huge need for coal, and eventually prices will go up.
“George Soros spent millions of dollars and multiple years helping to driving down price of coal,” said H. Sterling Burnett, research fellow and managing editor, at the Heartland Institute. “If he buys enough stock to have controlling interests in these coal businesses, closes them down and leaves the coal in the ground, we might accept that he is a true believer, that his investment was all about stopping climate change and saving the environment."
“But my suspicion is that he helped to drive stocks down, bought as many shares as he can, and, when stocks rebound, he can sell his shares and make a huge profit.”
 
Buy it cheap, stack it deep.

My opinion, exactly some of why the war on coal has been raging. To drive down the stock prices, because it's not always going to be a "bust" business.

My Dad always used to tell me:

Follow the money son.

Follow the money.

The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
 
Coal dust in air that comes off of rail cars polluting water? Really? Perhaps some EPA officials should stand in the bottom of the rail car for an inspection...right before they load it. The over reach of the tentacles is getting worse as are the grumblings of the subjects.
 
Yeah, that's a stretch, even for them.

Just wait until they start fining home and land owners for runoff and such with the recent additions to the clean water act.

It's coming.
 
Yeah, that's a stretch, even for them.

Just wait until they start fining home and land owners for runoff and such with the recent additions to the clean water act.

It's coming.
Here is an example of that from this week and it's over the top in ridiculous. This rancher built a stock pond for cattle to drink. He went through all of the legalities that Wyoming required and the water has tested cleaner exiting the pond than when it enters. Still, the EPA insists he get rid of it and that they have that authority. His fines from 2012 total 16 million.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...6-million-over-what-he-built-on-his-property/
 
Can't say that I'm surprised.

EPA needs to go.

Every stinking one of them.
 
EPA liars busted in Congressional hearing



"What do we do now?"

Well, it sure wouldn't be send contaminated water to the Navajo.

Would it?

http://watchdog.org/234738/navajo-nation-epa-water/
Begayefinger-600x450.jpg


Oiltank-600x450.jpg
 
How much trouble and how much would this have cost a independent or private company when the EPA was done with them.
 
How much trouble and how much would this have cost a independent or private company when the EPA was done with them.

That's the point of it all.

The private companies that will swoop in to clean this mess up will no doubt be under government contract, reporting directly to the EPA...
 
Of course they will be the lowest bidder. So you know it aint gunna get done "right".....and who foots that bill?

We do....
 
Doubt they'll bother with bids.

It'll be a subsidiary of a company that's part of an EPA branch, so they'll be paying themselves billions to clean it up...
 
And...I haven't seen anything about this on the news since they aired it. One story and done...they've moved on....
Disgusting....
 
Back
Top