Kill Bill C-21: Bury Their Desks
Class & Honesty: Government should take a lesson from Carey Price (LORNE GUNTER)
Sun political columnist Lorne Gunter lays out the problems with Bill C-21 while congratulating Carey Price for not bowing the knee to the 'woke army' that tr...
youtu.be
MacGregor For The Record On Bill C-21
Every MP Against C-21 (Tuesday December 13, 2022)
Liberal Hunting Rifle and Shotgun Ban Update 12/14/22
Liberal MP uses 'a .22 gauge' to hunt Lol, "break action, pump, single shot, semi auto center fire/rifle & shotgun w 5 rd mag/tube. 20mm bore dia, 10,000 joule muzzle energy, .22 plinkster, Ruger 9mm PC Carbine "RCMP/CFP/GOV expert called it a "AR variant" a "Patrol Carbine"(lol). BANNED!
It felt like 'Day One' in your average firearms training or hunter safety course, as Liberal Taleeb Noormohamed ran out the clock asking question after quest...
youtu.be
"Evergreen"
https://justiceforgunowners.ca/trudeaus-gun-grab-goes-evergreen/
Same SG, the one with the pistol grip banned
The Stag10 .308/6.5 was imported/approved by the RCMP/GOV in 2018 as it was specifically made for Hunting & Sport/Competition shooting giving it a "NR"(non restricted) designation. (18.5 inch barrel semi auto/center fire/5rd mg from factory/est 2017/Never seen war)Banned!May 1st 2020.
A similar issue arises with the Stag 10. A pre-ban version of the FRT has an even clearer statement in its Canadian Law Comments regarding the Stag 10: “The Stag Arms, Model STAG-10 firearm does not incorporate mechanical, aesthetic or other design features that can be traced directly to any particular firearm; it is therefore not considered a variant of any firearm found in the “Prohibited Firearms Regulations” or the “Restricted Firearms Regulations” appended to the Criminal Code.”
This pre-ban FRT entry for the Stag, made publicly available and current just days before the May 1 OIC, clearly states that the Stag 10 is explicitly not an AR variant.
A post-ban version of the same FRT entry, now reflecting the Stag’s current prohibited status, has no Canadian Law Comments.
This later version of the publicly available FRT, current as of last week, indicates that the Stag 10 is now prohibited as an AR variant.
In other words, evidence of the Stag’s justification for being non-restricted; that quite clear statement, “it is therefore not considered a variant of any firearm found in the “Prohibited Firearms Regulations” or the “Restricted Firearms Regulations,” has been removed, and the firearm reclassified… a move that, according to the previous FRT data and much like what we’re seeing with today’s prohibitions, seems to be beyond the scope of the OIC’s prohibition of explicitly AR variants.
We strongly recommend anyone with one of these rifles wait for further instruction. With such strong evidence of inappropriate tampering (with regards to the legal comments and other descriptors of formerly non-restricted firearms being summarily deleted from records) and prohibitions beyond the scope of the OIC’s regulatory amendments, it is highly likely that Judicial Reviews will be employed to address this overstepping.
Further to that point. The government authorizes those competitions by legislation that has not been repealed. It subsidizes those competitions by permitting them on Federal property and still does.
It sanctions the use of shooting ranges for those purposes, ranges whose range approvals still permit those competitions, knowing full well what equipment those competitions require.
If the government was genuinely of the belief that these firearms and those like them are not suitable for competition and such competitions are a danger to the public, then there are at least 20 other things that should have been banned along with the firearms themselves. The glaring inconsistencies definitely beg scrutiny.
"NR" pre May 1st 2020 ban/ "Canadian Law comments" in tact.
After May 1st 2020 ban, now designated as "Prohibited" & Canadian Law comments 'erased".
The Plot "Thickens"