Ban assault weapons, buy them back, go after resisters,” Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., argued
An assault weapon, then, is a hand-held weapon of war, capable of spraying a crowd with more lethal fire in seconds.
Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons. The ban would not apply to law enforcement agencies or shooting clubs.
Our courts haven’t found a constitutional right to have assault weapons, anyway.
Australia got it right.
was funded by a temporary 0.2% tax levy on national health insurance.
If we offer $200 to buy back each weapon
Consider this an investment
---------------------------------------
I just wanted to note a few exerpts above.
The most obvious, that Australia raised taxes in order to do their buyback, which means, you'd be paying to disarm yourself.
WTH kind of twisted logic is that?
An assault weapon, then, is a hand-held weapon of war, capable of spraying a crowd with more lethal fire in seconds.
Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons. The ban would not apply to law enforcement agencies or shooting clubs.
Our courts haven’t found a constitutional right to have assault weapons, anyway.
Australia got it right.
was funded by a temporary 0.2% tax levy on national health insurance.
If we offer $200 to buy back each weapon
Consider this an investment
---------------------------------------
I just wanted to note a few exerpts above.
The most obvious, that Australia raised taxes in order to do their buyback, which means, you'd be paying to disarm yourself.
WTH kind of twisted logic is that?