• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

ATF ruling on “forced reset triggers”

Scoop

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Global Moderator
U.S. Department of Justice
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives
Office of Enforcement Programs and Services
Office of Field Operations
Washington, DC 20226
www.atf.gov

March 22, 2022
OPEN LETTER TO ALL FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) recently examined devices commonly known as “forced reset triggers” (FRTs) and has determined that some of them are “firearms” and “machineguns” as defined in the National Firearms Act (NFA), and “machineguns” as defined in the Gun Control Act (GCA).
These particular FRTs are being marketed as replacement triggers for AR-type firearms. Unlike traditional triggers and binary triggers (sometimes referred to generally as “FRTs”), the subject FRTs do not require shooters to pull and then subsequently release the trigger to fire a second shot. Instead, these FRTs utilize the firing cycle to eliminate the need for the shooter to release the trigger before a second shot is fired. By contrast, some after-market triggers have similar
components but also incorporate a disconnector or similar feature to ensure that the trigger must be released before a second shot may be fired and may not be machineguns.
Both the NFA and GCA regulate machineguns. “Machinegun” is defined under 26 U.S.C.
§ 5845(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(23) as—
Any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot,
automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, and any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person. (Emphasis added.)
ATF’s examination found that some FRT devices allow a firearm to automatically expel more than one shot with a single, continuous pull of the trigger. For this reason, ATF has concluded that FRTs that function in this way are a combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, and hence, ATF has classified these devices as a “machinegun” as defined by the NFA and GCA.
Accordingly, ATF’s position is that any FRT that allows a firearm to automatically expel more than one shot with a single, continuous pull of the trigger is a “machinegun”, and is accordingly subject to the GCA prohibitions regarding the possession, transfer, and transport of machineguns



OPEN LETTER TO ALL FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES (cont.)
under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 922(a)(4). They are also subject to registration, transfer, taxation, and possession restrictions under the NFA. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861; 27 CFR 479.101.
Under 26 U.S.C. § 5871, any person who violates or fails to comply with the provisions of the NFA may be fined up to $10,000 per violation and is subject to imprisonment for a term of up to ten years. Further, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 5872, any machinegun possessed or transferred in violation of the NFA is subject to seizure and forfeiture. Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2), any
person who violates § 922(o) may be sent to prison for up to 10 years and fined up to $250,000 per person or $500,000 per organization.
Based on ATF’s determination that the FRTs that function as described above are
“machineguns” under the NFA and GCA, ATF intends to take appropriate remedial action with respect to sellers and possessors of these devices. Current possessors of these devices are encouraged to contact ATF for further guidance on how they may divest possession.
If you are uncertain whether the device you possess is a machinegun as defined by the GCA and NFA, please contact your local ATF Field Office.
You may consult the local ATF Office’s webpage
for office contact information. Assistant Director
Enforcement Programs and Services
 
Yeah, atf has been over-reaching in overdrive for months now.

They're changing serial number requirements for personally made firearms. Wanting to change how receivers are marked. Likely will be requiring more parts to have to go through FFL's (like barreled upper recievers if I were guessing-I am at the moment).

Wanting FFL's to require (or engrave themselves) items that have always been exempt prior. This is going to negatively affect a lot of people and puts FFL's in a precarious situation trying to comply with atf regs (which are not enacted law) just because atf says so.

They have arrested several people for making illegal silencers when purchasing threaded tubes trying to claim intent. Denied almost 1000 form 1 applications to make silencers through the NFA branch outright and refunded their $200 tax.

They have arrested a guy for selling machineguns because he had a piece of sheet metal laser engraved with a picture of a lightning link on it.

Yeah, they've been in high gear for a while now.

As for the FRT, the letter explaining it fails from the beginning which refers to the trigger assembly being a machinegun, because the product title has FORCED RESET right in its' name. It is impossible to hold the trigger back and continue to fire without the trigger being reset and firing 1 round per pull of the trigger.

So, this is more overreach from the criminal organization that the USA has become.

If that offends anyone, that's tough but is how I sincerely feel about it anymore.

ATF (and any other gov't agency) are tasked with interpreting laws. Not making their own and then enforcing their own. That is a direct conflict of interest.

So far, there are about 200 elected reps altogether that has signed onto multiple different letters asking atf to explain what they are doing.

Personally, I'm tired of strongly worded letters. I'm ready for people to start losing their pensions and being tarred and feathered in the street.

You would think it would be unconstitutional to arrest and charge people with felonies (or multiple felonies) when there are no laws prohibiting it.
 
Our government has decided that they can do whatever they want, and if it’s unconstitutional it’s your problem to prove it.

They should not be surprised in the end what this attitude gets them, but I suspect they will be.

What goes around comes around.
 
The courts are overwhelmed with "this law is probably unconstitutional " cases, but written by legislators and signed by governors or the president. If they think it is unconstitutional, it most likely is. Duh. It all gamesmanship to them.
 
Liberalism is a mental disorder! Just a bunch of power crazed buffoons.

Unfortunately crazy-rich in many cases. Lots of them should say, “Do you know who I am?” Right on the drivers license, instead of a signature.

The cops wouldn’t have to wonder as soon as they saw a big Mercedes and that license.
 
The courts are overwhelmed with "this law is probably unconstitutional " cases, but written by legislators and signed by governors or the president. If they think it is unconstitutional, it most likely is. Duh. It all gamesmanship to them.

Perhaps the penalty for proposing & promoting an unconstitutional law should be the same as for, let’s say, sedition?
 
Since the current administration occupied the White House...

A plan to hire 87,000 IRS (federal) agents.

The capital police (federal) proposed opening field offices in Miami, FL. and San Francisco, CA..

Just more federal agents to poke around and spy on the population.
 
The ATF must be reading from the RCMP handbook. The Queens cowboys (that's an insult to real cowboys I'm sure) have been doing this exact thing for decades and it's only getting worse.

Top law enforcement brass = un-elected government bureaucrat making up shite regualtions on the fly or re-interpreting long established understandings of firearms regulation and enforcing them like laws on a whim. Meanwhile criminalizing thousands if not millions of firearms owners in the process, most of whom are just hardworking folks who contribute to society. These nonsensical rules stop not one crime except what the government deems a crime. As I've said before, our firearms law is actually written right into the Criminal Code of Canada making any violation a criminal offense. It's bloody ridiculous. The ATF is trying to do the same damn thing. All it does is make criminals of lawful citizens going about their business.
 
Back
Top