• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

Is It Time To Organize The Revolution?

Dysfunctional

Dysfunctional

.270 WIN
Is It Time To Organize The Revolution?

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.” -Patrick Henry

"It is a growing conception that we cannot wait. While we sit and wait, our government continues an all-out assault on our rights as free men and women of the United States of America. Many people believe that there is no peaceful alternative. Many people believe that we must organize and fight. Today I can offer no concrete set of actions but I do want to lay out some thoughts that I think need to be discussed."

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/is-it ... evolution/

My friends, if you don't stand behind the Constitution, please stand in front of those who will defend it.
 
Interesting read. I understand where he's coming from, but this is a matter of timing. A couple things are needed. 1. Somebody of National stature to lead it. 2. Some bodies and martyrs in the streets. 3. A sense of oppression among a large percentage of the population.

We ain't there yet.
 
Blogger! Lol probably works for the Feds.....never trust someone trying to lead you into war that you don’t know and can’t see or touch.....that’s just stupid..."I'm just a blogger"......nuff said, probably a 15 year old girl
Here is a blog for ya…….. It’s already started……it isn’t going to look like any revolution of the past or any “conventional” war you ever seen….groups of people squaring off with Uncle Sam is stupid and suicide….anyone who hasn’t thought through that is already on the sidelines
 
oli700 said:
never trust someone trying to lead you into war that you don’t know and can’t see or touch.....that’s just stupid...
Click to expand...

I agree with ya....
 
oli700 said:
Here is a blog for ya…….. It’s already started……it isn’t going to look like any revolution of the past or any “conventional” war you ever seen….groups of people squaring off with Uncle Sam is stupid and suicide….anyone who hasn’t thought through that is already on the sidelines
Click to expand...

Yep. Most of the stuff I read on-line about this shows a severe lack of understanding of modern warfare, and usually boils down to somebody ranting about "cold dead hands". How about cold dead Ipad, PC, cellphone, etc.? ;)
 
you know....you have seen firsthand what happens to people who take on the throne
 
Dysfunctional said:
We all need to keep calling and writing - if the "motion to proceed" to S. 649 is adopted with 60 votes, then Feinstein's ban could be added as an amendment and passed in the Senate with only 50 votes (plus Biden). http://www.gunowners.org/congress03252013.htm
Click to expand...

Maybe these 3 Senators can derail this:

Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, are vowing to filibuster any new restrictions on guns, according to a letter the conservative trio wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

The warning comes just days after Reid announced plans to forge ahead on legislation that would expand background checks and stiffen penalties for gun trafficking after the Senate returns from a two-week Easter recess.

"We, the undersigned, intend to oppose any legislation that infringe on the American people's constitutional right to bear arms, or on their ability to exercise this right without being subjected to government surveillance," the senators wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by Fox News.

Although the gun-control bill Reid outlined last week does not include a controversial assault weapons ban, Reid has promised to hold a vote on that proposal, as well as limits on high-capacity magazines, as an amendment to the bill.

Reid told reporters the assault weapons ban was kept out of the bill because the measure lacked the votes to pass.

Paul, Lee and Cruz do not address specific proposals in their letter, which is only three paragraphs long.

"The Second Amendment to the Constitution protects citizens' right to self-defense. It speaks to history's lesson that government cannot be in all places at all times, and history's warning about the oppression of a government that tries," they wrote, concluding, "We will oppose the motion to proceed to any legislation that will serve as a vehicle for any additional gun restrictions."

Always a thorny subject for Capitol Hill lawmakers, the debate over gun control has only grown more contentious in the wake of the December shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03 ... z2OdrQ2zzu
Click to expand...
 
We are not paying attention to the real fight so long as we maintain focus on incidentals such as Gun Control (albeit that is one battle, but it is not the war). If we simply fight the tactical battles, but lose sight of the Strategic picture, we will lose. We must do both.

Since Obama declared his intention to "Fundamentally Transform" the country, we have been following the well-worn path from our original Form of Government ( The Republic that was spoken of by Franklin), to Democracy, and thence to the inevitable Oligarchy that is envisioned by Obama. Our fight is to preserve the Republic against this transformation. We are not trying to start a Revolution, we are trying to prevent one.

Let's examine this. We were set up as a Republic, as we know, but what exactly is meant by Form of Government.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Click to expand...

Here's a 10 minute video that describes the various Forms of Government and the progression that takes place from a Republic to an Oligarchy if it is not constantly prevented.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DioQooFIcgE[/youtube]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top