Folks, I know I can be conspiritorial at times and more or less distrustful of most elected officials. I just dont see where they fulfill their oath of office and pledge to be gaurdians of the Constitution.
This post is in regard to HR 1540, the National Defense Authorization Act, sections 1021, 1031, 1031e, and 1032.
I'll give the shortended version now and fill in the detail as I'm able to, I have a lot of information to go through, and I want to be thorough, clear and ... well, sometimes I'm concise. I'll back up whatever I post with links to whatever source I quote, but not until I have the actual language of the new regulations.
Heres the basics of it.
The office of the president of the United States of America has been given complete authority over the US military to use them as police and law enforcement to the ends of arresting "suspected" terrorists including US CITIZENS on AMERICAN SOIL without charge or trail and indefinite detainment!!! Section 1021 specifically grants authority to the president to deny due process to any American suspected of or charged of substantially supporting terrorism. (again I need to get the exact language here)
In the language, it mentions Al Qaeda and the Taliban, and persons suspected of supporting these entities, ... and heres where I need more info;
Mention is made of "having seven days of food on hand" and "owning firearms". I need to confirm thes pieces yet. I have seen it in type on news sites, but dont yet know the sources.
I warned of stuff like this at least a year ago and had been told it would take an act of congress ratifying the constitution for something like this to happen. But here it is, back door legislation Obama promised to veto, but signed as law I think Dec 23rd or 24th. (again unclear here) I do know that both houses agreed to the legislation as early as Dec 15th.
While the NDAA has been around for about 48 years, this bit of language is all new and errodes our 5th and 6th Ammendments as well as section 1 of the 14th Ammendment.
When I go back through all this, I'll post the Ammendments and the exact language of the new sections of the NDAA.
The implications and consequences are far reaching as this is all loosely worded and poorly written allowing for any number of things to be suspect of terrorism.
This is martial law without calling it martial law. Its straight out of 1939 Germany. The last time this happened in US history was during the Southern Reconstruction following the Civil War which was ended and banned in 1869 I think it was. It was proposed again during the McCarthy Era but was veto'd by Truman.
This is the end of Habeas Corpus and due process as prescribed by and protected by the US Constitution.
Some are called to be shepherds, others... watchdogs.
This post is in regard to HR 1540, the National Defense Authorization Act, sections 1021, 1031, 1031e, and 1032.
I'll give the shortended version now and fill in the detail as I'm able to, I have a lot of information to go through, and I want to be thorough, clear and ... well, sometimes I'm concise. I'll back up whatever I post with links to whatever source I quote, but not until I have the actual language of the new regulations.
Heres the basics of it.
The office of the president of the United States of America has been given complete authority over the US military to use them as police and law enforcement to the ends of arresting "suspected" terrorists including US CITIZENS on AMERICAN SOIL without charge or trail and indefinite detainment!!! Section 1021 specifically grants authority to the president to deny due process to any American suspected of or charged of substantially supporting terrorism. (again I need to get the exact language here)
In the language, it mentions Al Qaeda and the Taliban, and persons suspected of supporting these entities, ... and heres where I need more info;
Mention is made of "having seven days of food on hand" and "owning firearms". I need to confirm thes pieces yet. I have seen it in type on news sites, but dont yet know the sources.
I warned of stuff like this at least a year ago and had been told it would take an act of congress ratifying the constitution for something like this to happen. But here it is, back door legislation Obama promised to veto, but signed as law I think Dec 23rd or 24th. (again unclear here) I do know that both houses agreed to the legislation as early as Dec 15th.
While the NDAA has been around for about 48 years, this bit of language is all new and errodes our 5th and 6th Ammendments as well as section 1 of the 14th Ammendment.
When I go back through all this, I'll post the Ammendments and the exact language of the new sections of the NDAA.
The implications and consequences are far reaching as this is all loosely worded and poorly written allowing for any number of things to be suspect of terrorism.
This is martial law without calling it martial law. Its straight out of 1939 Germany. The last time this happened in US history was during the Southern Reconstruction following the Civil War which was ended and banned in 1869 I think it was. It was proposed again during the McCarthy Era but was veto'd by Truman.
This is the end of Habeas Corpus and due process as prescribed by and protected by the US Constitution.
Some are called to be shepherds, others... watchdogs.