• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

NFA Talk SE2EP11 Trudeau's 750M+ Gun Grab

The RCMP subsequently learned the killer paid a man named Neil Gallivan to purchase one assault-style rifle at a 2019 gun show in Houlton, Maine. The killer also obtained two illegal handguns from a close friend and collector named Sean Conlogue.

No charges have been laid against either Gallivan or Conlogue, and it’s still unclear why.
It's only unclear if you believe the line of horse-puckie being spun by these malfeasant sob's. It's perfectly clear to those of us being used as public punching bags and PR cannon fodder.
 
So, has JT had a visit from Meghan Markle and her ginger spare prince?

Maybe they could get Trudeau to help them set up a monarchy in exile.

Imagine the tabloids that would sell…
 
https://thegunblog.ca/2022/11/03/co...recy-request/?mc_cid=044c9d0821&mc_eid=UNIQID


Court Win: Judge Orders Details of RCMP’s ‘Nullifications,’ Says They Are Revocations




3 Nov 2022

Developing story. Please check back as we add info and context.

TheGunBlog.ca — Canadian gun owners won a major victory in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice today, advancing their fight against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s mass criminalizations and confiscations begun in May 2020.
Disclosure Order

Justice Antonio Skarica of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ordered details of the RCMP’s unprecedented and unheard of “nullifications” of firearm-registration certificates in 2020, and equated them to revocations.

The Trudeau administration and his allies in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police opposed the judge’s findings. They may appeal the decision.


Why It Matters

Today’s ruling is the second case gun owners have won in higher courts, compared to zero for Trudeau.
It expands the type of evidence that a provincial judge may order from the government in future hearings under Section 74 of the federal Firearms Act.
The victory was won by five gun owners who represented themselves in court without a lawyer.

Context

Trudeau’s governing Liberal Party and the RCMP have so far refused to disclose details of their “nullifications,” both in court and in responding to questions from TheGunBlog.ca
The RCMP invented the tactic to help Trudeau confiscate popular rifles and shotguns from hundreds of thousands of government-licensed owners.
Trudeau has no idea or plan for how to execute his crackdown. He failed to complete it by his April 2022 deadline and will probably fail again.

The Department of Justice in Ottawa didn’t respond immediately to our e-mail inviting a comment on today’s ruling.
Judge’s Disclosure Order

“The Crown is to provide disclosure relevant to the scripts used to identify the respondents’ firearms which is to include who created the scripts, when they were created, who was involved directly or indirectly in writing the scripts, who was consulted and the involvement of the Registrar in creating the scripts and the involvement of the Registrar in the preparation and dissemination of the July 20, 2020 letters the respondents received from the Registrar.” (Paragraph 50)
Judge Says ‘Nullification’ Is Revocation

“Accordingly, the Registrar, by “nullifying” and making registration certificates “no longer valid”, has revoked the registration certificates listed in the July 20, 2020 letters sent to the respondents: Stark at para 70.” (Paragraph 23) See Link at top of page)
 
A similar issue arises with the Stag 10. A pre-ban version of the FRT has an even clearer statement in its Canadian Law Comments regarding the Stag 10: “The Stag Arms, Model STAG-10 firearm does not incorporate mechanical, aesthetic or other design features that can be traced directly to any particular firearm; it is therefore not considered a variant of any firearm found in the “Prohibited Firearms Regulations” or the “Restricted Firearms Regulations” appended to the Criminal Code.”


This pre-ban FRT entry for the Stag, made publicly available and current just days before the May 1 OIC, clearly states that the Stag 10 is explicitly not an AR variant.


A post-ban version of the same FRT entry, now reflecting the Stag’s current prohibited status, has no Canadian Law Comments.



This later version of the publicly available FRT, current as of last week, indicates that the Stag 10 is now prohibited as an AR variant.



In other words, evidence of the Stag’s justification for being non-restricted; that quite clear statement, “it is therefore not considered a variant of any firearm found in the “Prohibited Firearms Regulations” or the “Restricted Firearms Regulations,” has been removed, and the firearm reclassified… a move that, according to the previous FRT data and much like what we’re seeing with today’s prohibitions, seems to be beyond the scope of the OIC’s prohibition of explicitly AR variants.


We strongly recommend anyone with one of these rifles wait for further instruction. With such strong evidence of inappropriate tampering (with regards to the legal comments and other descriptors of formerly non-restricted firearms being summarily deleted from records) and prohibitions beyond the scope of the OIC’s regulatory amendments, it is highly likely that Judicial Reviews will be employed to address this overstepping.


Further to that point. The government authorizes those competitions by legislation that has not been repealed. It subsidizes those competitions by permitting them on Federal property and still does.


It sanctions the use of shooting ranges for those purposes, ranges whose range approvals still permit those competitions, knowing full well what equipment those competitions require.


If the government was genuinely of the belief that these firearms and those like them are not suitable for competition and such competitions are a danger to the public, then there are at least 20 other things that should have been banned along with the firearms themselves. The glaring inconsistencies definitely beg scrutiny.
 
Back
Top