• Mossberg Owners is in the process of upgrading the software. Please bear with us while we transition to the new look and new upgraded software.

What Islamic Supremacism really is

GunnyGene

GunnyGene

Racist old man
BANNED
And article by Pamela Geller appeared on Brietbart today. Essentially warning the Western World to not allow ourselves to be fooled.

Our victory in this global conflict will only be assured when the majority of Americans (and all free people) truly understand the nature of the conflict. The common man is being willfully misled by the political and media elites about the religious imperative that is behind the Islamic war against the West. Most people have still never even heard of Islamic supremacism – or realize just how pervasive it is.

It starts with the Qur’an. In October 2011 I was on "Hannity" debating Muslim activist Michael Ghouse. On the show Ghouse presented me with an enormous Qur’an, courtesy of the Hamas-tied Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR): The Message of the Qur'an, Translated and Explained by Muhammad Asad. Ghouse is a “moderate,” and this is supposed to be a “moderate” translation.

In it, Allah says to the Jews who “profaned the Sabbath,” “Be as apes despicable!” (2:65). And as for “women whose ill-will you have reason to fear,” the Qur’an says: “admonish them [first]; then leave them alone in bed; then beat them" (4:34; the bracketed word is in the book in this and all other quotes). This “moderate” Qur’an translation says that Allah has “disowned” the “hypocrites” -- that is, people who pretend to be Muslim but aren’t really, or who were once Muslim but leave the religion. It says that if they “revert to [open] enmity,” the Muslims should “seize them and slay them wherever you may find them” (4:89).

More: Muslims should “fight in God’s cause against those who wage war against you, and do not commit aggression, for, verily, God does not love aggressors. And slay them wherever you find them” (2:190-191). Don’t commit aggression, but slay them wherever you find them. Right. Muslims are supposed to fight against those who have “denied the truth” until “there is no more oppression and all worship is devoted to God alone” (8:39). So now Muslims have to fight unbelievers until everyone worships only Allah.

Muslims are told to “fight against those who -- despite having been vouchsafed revelation [aforetime] -- do not [truly] believe either in God or the Last Day, and do not consider forbidden that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and do not follow the religion of truth [which God has enjoined upon them], till they [agree to] pay the exemption tax with a willing hand, after having been humbled [in war]” (9:29).

Those who have been “vouchsafed revelation aforetime” are the Jews and Christians. The “Apostle” is Muhammad. So Muslims must fight Jews and Christians until they have been “humbled” and pay a special tax.

So Muslims are supposed to beat women whose “ill-will” they “have reason to fear,” and kill those who wage war against them, and hypocrites who are in open enmity against them, wherever they find them. They must also fight against and subjugate Jews and Christians. Muslims who pray the required five daily prayers curse Christians and Jews no less than 17 times. Every day. It was no surprise, then, in May when, Breitbart News reported that “family members of Navy SEALs who died on duty in Afghanistan claim that an Islamic cleric ‘damned’ the servicemen’s bodies at their memorial ceremony.” They were, after all, non-Muslims. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013 ... -Really-Is
Click to expand...
 
They will move into every powerful office, make changes slowly and internally until is too late to have them removed. A couple interesting albeit biased articles on the same (Habeeb-gate):

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atla ... eech-.html

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfiel ... -the-aclu/

That’s the core ACLU mission. Protect the Muslim right to Jihad while completely ignoring free speech. The old ACLU was engaged in promoting a Communist victory but it believed that the best way to do that was through an open society. Now it’s promoting an Islamist victory and it no longer sees the open society as its method of choice, but an Islamist supremacist society that gives special rights to Muslims while denying them to everyone else.
Click to expand...
 
You can cherry-pick verses from any of the holy books and find all kinds of questionable material. Evil people will justify their despicable actions by using those verses to try and bring legitimacy to their crimes. I see very little difference between modern-day Muslim extremists and the so-called "Christians" who rode around wearing white hoods lynching black people in the South. The main difference is by and large these extremists are not in positions of power within their respective countries... they are the hopelessly poor with nothing to lose and embrace a twisted desire for "Martyrdom", and become expendable agents to their "Spiritual Leaders".

It'll take a generation or two as more armed revolts put down tyrant after tyrant in the middle east and these folks take control of their future. The real turning point will be when the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia is finally done away with.... but unfortunately they have had the unwavering support of our wonderful government for decades (both Republican and Democrat), with no end in sight. All to stand as a regional counterweight against Iran, where the government is antagonistic against the US and Israel. Ironically, the majority of young Iranians have a very favorable view of the US and want to get rid of the Ayatolas... but they have no weapons, no means of taking back their own country from a cabal of out-of-touch, power-addicted "Holy Men".

Pretty messed up.
 
Comarade said:
You can cherry-pick verses from any of the holy books and find all kinds of questionable material. Evil people will justify their despicable actions by using those verses to try and bring legitimacy to their crimes. I see very little difference between modern-day Muslim extremists and the so-called "Christians" who rode around wearing white hoods lynching black people in the South. The main difference is by and large these extremists are not in positions of power within their respective countries... they are the hopelessly poor with nothing to lose and embrace a twisted desire for "Martyrdom", and become expendable agents to their "Spiritual Leaders".

It'll take a generation or two as more armed revolts put down tyrant after tyrant in the middle east and these folks take control of their future. The real turning point will be when the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia is finally done away with.... but unfortunately they have had the unwavering support of our wonderful government for decades (both Republican and Democrat), with no end in sight. All to stand as a regional counterweight against Iran, where the government is antagonistic against the US and Israel. Ironically, the majority of young Iranians have a very favorable view of the US and want to get rid of the Ayatolas... but they have no weapons, no means of taking back their own country from a cabal of out-of-touch, power-addicted "Holy Men".

Pretty messed up.
Click to expand...


That is true. They held sway in their local areas, branching out a bit at a time but never fully engulfing the entire country. The radical Islamics appear to be setting themselves up throughout the country, slowly pushing other groups out and interjecting their version of right and wrong. Shariah law has been imposed in some areas of the country, only for Muslims as of right now, but who is say that won't change as things progress. They have declared jihad on us non-believers...I believe we need to jihad right back at them.
 
Looks like Obama has figured out a way to increase the muslim population in the U.S.:

The Obama administration is considering resettling thousands of refugees who left Syria during the country's ongoing civil war to multiple towns and cities across the United States, the L.A. Times reports.


A resettlement plan under discussion in Washington and other capitals is aimed at relieving pressure on Middle Eastern countries straining to support 1.6 million refugees, as well as assisting hard-hit Syrian families.

The State Department is "ready to consider the idea," an official from the department said, if the administration receives a formal request from the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees, which is the usual procedure.

The United States usually accepts about half the refugees that the U.N. agency proposes for resettlement. California has historically taken the largest share, but Illinois, Florida, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia are also popular destinations.
 
That is so f'ed up on so many levels. We can't support the ones we have now but we're going to add more? You know where the riots are going to start? In the inner cities when the government starts taking from them to give to the new "refugees". Without being racist or starting an online war, I'll say I've seen it in south FL. When all the Latinos moved in the blacks started raising hell because they felt like they were being pushed out and their entitlements taken away. Same thing is going to happen. Instant civil war followed by a government crackdown, i.e. martial law. I just hope it ain't so...
 
OhioArcher said:
That is so f'ed up on so many levels. We can't support the ones we have now but we're going to add more? You know where the riots are going to start? In the inner cities when the government starts taking from them to give to the new "refugees". Without being racist or starting an online war, I'll say I've seen it in south FL. When all the Latinos moved in the blacks started raising hell because they felt like they were being pushed out and their entitlements taken away. Same thing is going to happen. Instant civil war followed by a government crackdown, i.e. martial law. I just hope it ain't so...
Click to expand...

Misplaced bleeding heart compassion always leads to problems, and aggravates existing ones.

It's also starting to look like another proxy war in the offing.

Al Arabiya

Information on alleged chemical weapons use by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad that was provided by the United States to Russia “does not look convincing,” President Vladimir Putin's senior foreign policy adviser said on Friday.

“What was presented by the Americans does not look convincing to us,” Yury Ushakov told reporters at a press conference.

Ushakov also said that Washington's decision to expand U.S. military support for Assad's opponents undermines joint efforts to organize a peace conference.

“Of course if the Americans truly decide and in reality provide more large-scale assistance to rebels, assistance to the opposition, it won't make the preparation of the international conference easier,” he added.

He also noted that Moscow was “not yet” considering sending Assad S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems in response.

The news comes after the White House promised to provide "military support" to Syrian rebel forces on Thursday after it had concluded the Assad regime used nerve gas against citizens and crossed what President Barack Obama had called a ‘red line.’

The Obama administration said it has provided Russia with the proof and the subject will be discussed at an upcoming G8 summit.

Britain has meanwhile said that it agrees with the United States' assessment that the Syrian regime used chemical weapons and called for a "strong, determined" response from the international community.

Foreign Secretary William Hague said Britain would be discussing that response "urgently" with the United States, France and other countries.

Earlier, a report by the New York Times said U.S. and European intelligence experts concluded that army of Assad has used chemical weapons against his people.

“The “intelligence community assesses that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale against the opposition multiple times in the last year,” the Times reported, citing an “an internal memorandum circulating inside the government.”

President Obama said in April that there was evidence that gas Sarin was used in Syria but there was not enough proof. “He now believes that the proof is definitive,” the Times quoted American officials as saying.

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/wo ... ssia-.html
Click to expand...
 
999321_528674063866091_441073369_n.jpg
 
carbinemike said:
Looks like Obama has figured out a way to increase the muslim population in the U.S.:
Click to expand...

:lol: Really.....but I totally agree with this:


OhioArcher said:
They will move into every powerful office, make changes slowly and internally until is too late to have them removed. A couple interesting albeit biased articles on the same (Habeeb-gate):

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atla ... eech-.html

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfiel ... -the-aclu/

That’s the core ACLU mission. Protect the Muslim right to Jihad while completely ignoring free speech. The old ACLU was engaged in promoting a Communist victory but it believed that the best way to do that was through an open society. Now it’s promoting an Islamist victory and it no longer sees the open society as its method of choice, but an Islamist supremacist society that gives special rights to Muslims while denying them to everyone else.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top