Looking for thoughts and advice on reducing the racking effort on my 590A1. It definitely takes more effort to cock and chamber a round on my 590A1 than on my 500 or 88. The gun has been thoroughly cleaned and fired at least 400 rounds. The parkerizing on the bolt and other innards seems to be wearing in nicely.
Have read the thread about trigger springs, but I am pleased with the trigger just as it is; I even like double action revolvers. There is not quite as much difference if I rack the guns with the hammer cocked, so I am thinking that the hammer spring may be the main difference. As a side note the safety is difficult to engage, but not a real problem as I have never needed it. If I chamber a round then it is time for it to go bang.
So should I just be happy with my mil spec shotty or is there a solution that will not affect reliability?
Have read the thread about trigger springs, but I am pleased with the trigger just as it is; I even like double action revolvers. There is not quite as much difference if I rack the guns with the hammer cocked, so I am thinking that the hammer spring may be the main difference. As a side note the safety is difficult to engage, but not a real problem as I have never needed it. If I chamber a round then it is time for it to go bang.
So should I just be happy with my mil spec shotty or is there a solution that will not affect reliability?