Y'all touched on a couple points in that 07 proposal, it mentioned any firearm that could be considered for military or law enforcement procurement, shotguns with more than a 5 round capacity, and shotguns with a revolving cylinder. Also "thumbhole stocks". I believe that one is because of the SVD and Dragonov rifles?
My first thoughts went to OFMs 500 Persuader 20" (7 +1) and the 20" 590 (8+1) and the Rossi Circuit Judge as well. Additionally OFM 500s turkey models with thumbhole stocks. This has nothing to do with anything accept for a vague resemblance to the Dragonov. So a thumbhole stock on a turkey gun makes one a smothbore 12 ga sniper. Not to mention makes you able to leap tall buildings in a single bound.
It mentioned the folding and adjustable stocks with regard changing the over all length and concealability, I imagine pistol grips to that end as well? I dunno, perhaps simply because it makes firearms appear as their military counterparts.
How about the arguement no self respecting military would use a civy AR15? Doesn't matter I guess, they're still tryin to legitimize the "serious hunter" arguement. Serious hunters don't need these sorts of arms. How about get out of my life and leave me alone? I bought firearms I liked and have used them in manners consistent with traditional hunting and paper punching...
No matter. I too have in all truthfulness sold almost everything just to make ends meet. 590A1, 500, 1911, AR, just to put food on the table. Haven't said anything cuz I didn't wanna feel less part of this group. BUT, id like to be able to purchase those again in the future darnit. I still have a bird gun and a borrowed 1300... still here to fight though!