He is right about one thing - very few people are luke warm about guns - they are either 'all for' or 'all against'.
What boggles the mind is the crazy anti-gun laws in New York City for example, and that about 95% of the people there are so adamantly anti-gun.
My question is, when there is a natural disaster, economic crash, or other significant event that suspends power, water, and food, how do those same people expect to be able to protect or provide for themselves and their families?